Left Brain, Right Brain Survey
By Jesse, himself. on Mar 16, 2007 in CatchAll, Distractions
Alright, seeing Murph’s post about his results, I thought it might be fun to run my first Blog Survey.
Here’s the deal: visit the wonderful Right Brain/Left Brain quiz and then leave your results in the comments - and your assessment of the results. Did the quiz nail you, in terms of your perception of your left brain/right brain self?
Just to get the ball rolling, my results where Right Brain 74% / Left Brain 34% - I think that’s pretty good.
Murph comments from his origional comment on another blog post:
“According to the test results I’m 64% left and 44% right. That seems pretty accurate to me.” .
Jesse | Mar 16, 2007 | Reply
My results were:
Right Brain |||||||||||||| 52%
Left Brain |||||||||||| 46%
Might’ve thought I would’ve been more Left Brain…
Julian | Mar 16, 2007 | Reply
These are my scores:
Right Brain |||||||||||||| 52%
Left Brain |||||||||||| 46%
I am not surprised with my results. They are exactly the same as Julian’s.
Liam | Mar 16, 2007 | Reply
Brain Lateralization Test ResultsRight Brain (52%) The right hemisphere is the visual, figurative, artistic, and intuitive side of the brain.Left Brain (42%) The left hemisphere is the logical, articulate, assertive, and practical side of the brain
Carol | Mar 16, 2007 | Reply
Left Brain 72%, Right Brain 30%. I am not surprised at the results. Need to work on the right brain.
Pat | Mar 17, 2007 | Reply
I need to work on my brain in general!
Nice to hear from you Pat:)
Jesse | Mar 18, 2007 | Reply
I scored 60 right, 38 left. Whatever.
JR | Mar 23, 2007 | Reply
Jess;
Read the piece on the ethanol hoax. I might lend it more credence if Michael Moore, Jesse Jackson and Gore Vidal weren’t members of the Nation Associate group or the likes of Tom Hayden wasn’t on the Editorial Board.You don’t suppose these folk have a common agenda?
JIM MURPHY | Apr 10, 2007 | Reply
Of course they have a common agenda - that’s why they belong to the same organization. I’ll go a step further - I wish we could get some neo-conservatives into the discussion so that the environment could be dealt with as a non-partisan issue.
Even if we were to suppose for a minute that global warming was overhyped, isn’t it still sensible to look for ways to reduce our dependency on non-renewable resources? And if the liberal democrats are the first ones to figure that out, should that mean that it’s not valid?
Heck, even George has conceded it’s a problem.
Jesse | Apr 10, 2007 | Reply
I get pissed with energy critics of any political stripe who never offer a viable alternative to the use of non-renewable resources and that’s exactly what Von Hoffman is guilty of in his article. I have to assume that he is proposing that the US make the switch to high speed electric trains to replace the current crop of diesel electrics.
If my assumption is correct then it follows that Von Hoffman is also a proponent of nuclear energy in as much as 75% of France’s electric energy is nuclear. If that’s not the case then what is his practical alternative? I didn’t see that anywhere in the article. Surely he isn’t endorsing the construction of more coal fired generating stations.
jim murphy | Apr 11, 2007 | Reply
I have to agree with you there: alternatives have to be presented. But to be fair, they have to be developed and to develop alternatives there needs to be political will through supporting research and development. If we’d started in January of 2000 with a plan to reduce our dependency on fossil fuels, and to reward our best and brightest minds by funding that research, we would be a lot farther ahead. And that is partisan, I admit.
Jesse | Apr 12, 2007 | Reply
I took the quiz twice. Both times it came back R Brain - 0
L Brain - 0
On the third try a window popped up and asked: Did you work on Katts & Dog ?
How are you buddy!!!
Rob | May 11, 2007 | Reply
Odd. The ‘zero’ result typically only happens with film producers.
Jesse | May 11, 2007 | Reply